Jihadist die poseerde met afgehakt hoofd mag land niet meer in

Een van oorsprong Iraakse jihadist uit Almere mag Nederland niet meer in. Minister Opstelten schrijft op Kamervragen van de PVV dat het verblijfsrecht van de man is beëindigd en dat de Immigratie en Naturalisatiedienst hem een inreisverbod heeft opgelegd van 20 jaar. Als hij toch terugkeert naar Nederland, bekijkt het OM of hij kan worden vervolgd, bijvoorbeeld voor oorlogsmisdrijven.

Van de man circuleerde kort geleden een foto waarop hij te zien was met vijf afgehakte hoofden. Het is niet duidelijk waar de foto is gemaakt en wie de hoofden heeft afgehakt.


Lees verder op: NOS

Waarom een inreisverbod voor maar 20 jaar? Waarom niet levenslang? Dan ben je toch verder van het gezeur af? Of verwacht "men" nog dat deze man over 20 jaar bij een inreis in Nederland iets positiefs gaat bijdragen? Belachelijk!

Whether we like it or not, we remain a dominant military superpower

Great clip.

As Lori Zigante at Red State points out:

Whether we like it or not. That’s like what Mommies say when telling you to eat your yucky vegetables. Would he prefer that we be vulnerable and weak? Heck of an American Can-Do attitude, Barry!

See: Obama and His Administration Lament America’s Superpower Status

But it gets worse. Then comes the remark regarding peace in the Middle East, i.e. between Israel and the "Palestinians", almost at the end of the clip:

"and when conflicts break out; one way or another, we get drawn into 'em, and that ends up costing us significantly, in terms of both blood and treasure."

For a moment there I was not quite sure whether I was listening to the President of the United States or to Osama Bin Laden. How much American blood has actually been spilled in the conflicts between Israel and the "Palestinians"? Have American troops seen action in Gaza or on the West Bank? Could he be talking about other wars? Apparently, yes, he can. What Barack Hussein Obama is slyly repeating in this clip is the mantra of every jihadi and jihad-sympathizer on earth: the root cause of all Muslim/infidel strife in the world is the conflict between Israel and the "Palestinians".

Yes, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are costing the US significantly, in terms of both blood and treasure. But whether the West wants to acknowledge it or not: those wars are just the latest bloody episodes in the jihad against the unbelievers that was started in the seventh century by Mohammed. The Israel/"Palestinian" conflict is nothing more than a recruiting tool for the Muslim cannon fodder/voting cattle and bleeding-heart Westerners.

Joseph Farah in 2002 at WorldNetDaily.com:

Way back on March 31, 1977, the Dutch newspaper Trouw published an interview with Palestine Liberation Organization executive committee member Zahir Muhsein. Here's what he said:

“The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism.

“For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan.”

and:

In fact, on the same day Arafat signed the Declaration of Principles on the White House lawn in 1993, he explained his actions on Jordan TV. Here's what he said:

"Since we cannot defeat Israel in war, we do this in stages. We take any and every territory that we can of Palestine, and establish a sovereignty there, and we use it as a springboard to take more. When the time comes, we can get the Arab nations to join us for the final blow against Israel."

No matter how many people convince themselves that the aspirations for Palestinian statehood are genuine and the key to peace in the Middle East, they are still deceiving themselves.

I've said it before and I say it again, in the history of the world, Palestine has never existed as a nation. The region known as Palestine was ruled alternately by Rome, by Islamic and Christian Crusaders, by the Ottoman Empire and, briefly, by the British after World War I. The British agreed to restore at least part of the land to the Jewish people as their ancestral homeland. It was never ruled by Arabs.

See: Palestinian People Do Not Exist

So there you have it. The Commander in Chief of the like-it-or-not dominant military power spouting Muslim propaganda. Who thinks we can continue to go on like this and not end up living in a brand-new Caliphate?

Fitzgerald: A Nest of Ninnies

Saturday, November 7: I have spent much of today listening to programs and reading online as much as I can stand of the American and foreign coverage about Fort Hood, and the mass-murdering Nidal Malik Hasan. I have been subjected today to as much nonsense and demisemihemi quasi-quavering distractions and deceptions, from various quarters, as a sane human being can stand. Everyone and his brother seems determined to say things that are palpably nonsensical about Nidal Hasan, the "Palestinian" Arab - though born and raised in America - and devout Muslim who never hid his faith in Islam.

How then, did the newspapers, did the commentators on the networks - all the networks - how did NPR, handle this subject which for all of them was apparently too hot to handle?

They spouted nonsense and lies. They tried every which way but up to make it seem as though Major Hasan was deeply disturbed, just one more mentally ill person, akin to the Columbine shooters, motivelessly malignant, someone whose behavior could not possibly have been predicted, because there was nothing about him that could lead to think him capable of such an act. Or in the alternative, they tried to make it seem as if anyone who had heard the stories that Major Hasan must have heard from returning soldiers would of course suffer deeply, and come unhinged, and such unhingement would naturally express itself - doesn't it always? - in mass-murdering fellow soldiers, as an expression of his dismay.

Jihad Watch