vrijdag 29 december 2017
donderdag 28 december 2017
‘Voor profeet en Führer’: 600.000 moslims vochten voor de Nazi’s
Pact tussen links en islam vormt opnieuw grootste bedreiging voor Europa
Het in 2014 gepubliceerde Engelstalige boek van historicus David Motadel over het pact tussen de islam en Hitler (‘Islam and Nazi Germany’s War’) is onlangs in het Duits vertaald, en heet ‘Für Prophet und Führer’. Het Duitse blad Focus brak tot verbazing van velen met de politieke correctheid door een artikel te wijden aan de 600.000 moslims die in dienst van de Nazi’s vochten. SS-Reichsführer Heinrich Himmler zei het al: de moslims hebben dezelfde doelstellingen als wij, namelijk de ‘wereld van de Joden bevrijden’. Uitgerekend datzelfde Duitsland –en in zijn kielzog de rest van West Europa- laat nu opnieuw eenzelfde racistische haatideologie binnen zijn grenzen toe, en geeft diens volgelingen zelfs speciale bescherming.
‘Het is toch duidelijk, wat zou de moslims in Europa en de hele wereld van ons Duitsers moeten scheiden. Wij hebben gemeenschappelijke doelen,’ zei Himmler op 11 januari 1944 tegen een moslimofficier in Bosnië. ‘Tenslotte heeft God –jullie zeggen Allah, dat is toch hetzelfde- de Führer gestuurd om Europa en de hele wereld van de Joden te bevrijden. Duitsers en moslims hebben dezelfde vijanden: bolsjewisten, Engeland, Amerika, allemaal steeds weer aangedreven door Joden.’
Nazi’s waren islamofielen, 600.000 moslims in troepen
Motadel schrijft ook dat de Führer zelf een grote fan was van de islam, en noemt hem zelfs ‘islamofiel’, een titel die veel hedendaagse politieke leiders in West Europa inmiddels bijzonder goed zou passen. Al in 1941 zei Hitler tijdens een bijeenkomst met de Nazi top (met o.a. Von Ribbentrop, Rosenberg en Goebbels) dat ‘het Mohammedanisme mij voor de hemel nog kan opwinden. Maar wanneer ik mij de saaie christelijke hemel voorstel!’ (2)
Focus wijst er verder op dat ‘de Wehrmacht en de SS behoorlijk succesvol waren bij het werven van moslim soldaten. Auteur David Motadel schat dat midden 1943 zo’n 300.000 moslims in de troepen vochten, en een jaar later 600.000.’ Die kwamen voornamelijk uit de Turkse gebieden en de Kaukasus, en minder uit Arabië. ‘De moslim soldaten golden als effectieve en wrede strijders. Alleen de Arabieren werden als niet loyaal en onbetrouwbaar beschouwd.’
Verder lezen>>>
 |
| (Afbeelding: David Motadel, ‘Für Prophet und Führer). |
‘Het is toch duidelijk, wat zou de moslims in Europa en de hele wereld van ons Duitsers moeten scheiden. Wij hebben gemeenschappelijke doelen,’ zei Himmler op 11 januari 1944 tegen een moslimofficier in Bosnië. ‘Tenslotte heeft God –jullie zeggen Allah, dat is toch hetzelfde- de Führer gestuurd om Europa en de hele wereld van de Joden te bevrijden. Duitsers en moslims hebben dezelfde vijanden: bolsjewisten, Engeland, Amerika, allemaal steeds weer aangedreven door Joden.’
Nazi’s waren islamofielen, 600.000 moslims in troepen
Motadel schrijft ook dat de Führer zelf een grote fan was van de islam, en noemt hem zelfs ‘islamofiel’, een titel die veel hedendaagse politieke leiders in West Europa inmiddels bijzonder goed zou passen. Al in 1941 zei Hitler tijdens een bijeenkomst met de Nazi top (met o.a. Von Ribbentrop, Rosenberg en Goebbels) dat ‘het Mohammedanisme mij voor de hemel nog kan opwinden. Maar wanneer ik mij de saaie christelijke hemel voorstel!’ (2)
Focus wijst er verder op dat ‘de Wehrmacht en de SS behoorlijk succesvol waren bij het werven van moslim soldaten. Auteur David Motadel schat dat midden 1943 zo’n 300.000 moslims in de troepen vochten, en een jaar later 600.000.’ Die kwamen voornamelijk uit de Turkse gebieden en de Kaukasus, en minder uit Arabië. ‘De moslim soldaten golden als effectieve en wrede strijders. Alleen de Arabieren werden als niet loyaal en onbetrouwbaar beschouwd.’
Verder lezen>>>
donderdag 21 december 2017
Palestinians Destroy Important Israeli Archaeological Site in Jericho
 |
| King Herod |
Israel entrusted one of its great archaeological treasures to the Palestinians. They destroyed it.
The Palestinians are systematically destroying King Herod’s grand Third Palace in Jericho by stripping its stone and building homes around it, thereby erasing a testament to the Jews’ deep roots to the Land of Israel.
Israel Hayom reported Tuesday that a team from the Kfar Etzion Field School visited the site recently and was appalled to find that the Palestinians, who received the important site as part of the Oslo Accords, had built housing around it. Some homes were constructed on the grounds of the palace itself. The remains of the palace are being systematically demolished to construct a road. The historic edifice is being stripped of its stone, and the supporting pillars and arches have been defaced.
Most of Herod’s Third Palace, lies within Area A, under full Palestinian control.
Read more>>>
donderdag 14 december 2017
Why Glenn Greenwald Deserves a Pulitzer Prize
For his poignant and intrepid rebuke of the American media's obsession with a false narrative.
There’s only one American journalist who truly merits a Pulitzer Prize this year: Glenn Greenwald. He’s been on the biggest story of the year from day one. No, I don’t mean Russiagate, the main stage for the media’s preening self-advertisements of its heroic “resistance,” like “Democracy Dies in Darkness.” In fact, the narrative holding that Donald Trump colluded with Russia is the chief piece of evidence that Greenwald has used to nail the year’s real top story—how the American press became a woozy facsimile of Pravda.Last week, Greenwald called out the press for its latest blunder: “Friday was one of the most embarrassing days for the U.S. media in quite a long time,” wrote Greenwald. “The humiliation orgy was kicked off by CNN, with MSNBC and CBS close behind, with countless pundits, commentators and operatives joining the party throughout the day. By the end of the day, it was clear that several of the nation’s largest and most influential news outlets had spread an explosive but completely false news story to millions of people while refusing to provide any explanation of how it happened.”
The question of why everyone got the same big scoop on the same day—only to find that the story was totally wrong—is a thread that leads to some very interesting places. So let’s follow it.
Read more>>>
dinsdag 12 december 2017
One Mueller-Investigation Coincidence Too Many
Stacking the deck with anti-Trump staffers is proving to be a really bad idea. Special prosecutors, investigators, and counsels are usually a bad idea.
They are admissions that constitutionally mandated institutions don’t work — and can be rescued only by supposed superhuman moralists, who are without the innate biases inherent in human nature.The record from Lawrence Walsh to Ken Starr to Patrick Fitzgerald suggests otherwise. Originally narrow mandates inevitably expand — on the cynical theory that everyone has something embarrassing to hide. Promised “short” timelines and limited budgets are quickly forgotten. Prosecutors search for ever new crimes to justify the expense and public expectations of the special-counsel appointment.
Soon the investigators need to be investigated for their own conflicts of interest, as if we need special-special or really, really special prosecutors. Special investigations often quickly turn Soviet, in the sense of “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime.”
Special Counsel Robert Mueller has led what seems to be an exemplary life of public service. No doubt he believes that as a disinterested investigator he can get to the bottom of the once contentious charge of “Russian collusion” in the 2016 election. But can he?
Read more>>>
maandag 11 december 2017
Bonusquote – Amsterdamse dominee: ‘Moslims bedreigen mijn gemeenteleden’
'Christenen durven onvoldoende donkere kant islam te benoemen, worden in hoek extreem-rechts gezet'
“Christenen durven onvoldoende de donkere kant van de islam te benoemen. Onlangs is weer een gemeentelid bedreigd door mensen met een islamitische achtergrond. En dat is niet de eerste keer. De stilte die hierover heerst moet worden doorbroken. Wie dit durft te benoemen wordt helaas direct in de hoek van extreemrechts geplaatst.
Tijdens doopdiensten [van tot het christendom bekerde moslims] verzoeken we gasten bijvoorbeeld om geen foto’s te maken en vanwege de veiligheid moeten dopelingen sommige details in hun levensverhaal achterwege laten. Voordat we foto’s op Facebook delen wordt gecheckt of onze broeders en zusters met een moslimachtergrond daar niet op staan. Als zij in de publiciteit zouden komen, is hun leven in gevaar. Ik vind het zorgelijk dat het zo werkt in een vrij land als Nederland. Eigenlijk is dat bizar.
Verder lezen>>>
“Christenen durven onvoldoende de donkere kant van de islam te benoemen. Onlangs is weer een gemeentelid bedreigd door mensen met een islamitische achtergrond. En dat is niet de eerste keer. De stilte die hierover heerst moet worden doorbroken. Wie dit durft te benoemen wordt helaas direct in de hoek van extreemrechts geplaatst.
Tijdens doopdiensten [van tot het christendom bekerde moslims] verzoeken we gasten bijvoorbeeld om geen foto’s te maken en vanwege de veiligheid moeten dopelingen sommige details in hun levensverhaal achterwege laten. Voordat we foto’s op Facebook delen wordt gecheckt of onze broeders en zusters met een moslimachtergrond daar niet op staan. Als zij in de publiciteit zouden komen, is hun leven in gevaar. Ik vind het zorgelijk dat het zo werkt in een vrij land als Nederland. Eigenlijk is dat bizar.
Verder lezen>>>
zondag 10 december 2017
EU is niet genoeg: Martin Schulz wil de “Verenigde Staten van Europa”
(Vertaling: E.J. Bron)
SPD-chef wil Europese vereniging tot 2025
SPD-grootheid Schulz vindt de EU niet voldoende. Hij wil de “Verenigde Staten van Europa”. Daarmee danst hij naar de pijpen van Jean-Claude Juncker. Het concert van de Brusselse EU-centralisten wordt steeds luider.
De EU volstaat niet. Het moet meer worden. Meer centralisme. Meer bureaucratie. Meer betutteling van bovenaf. De Brusselse politici en bureaucraten dromen van de “Verenigde Staten van Europa. Of het nu de CDU is, de SPD, de FDP of de Groenen: allemaal zingen en dansen ze op de EU-centralisme melodie alsof er geen morgen zou bestaan.
Trump tijdens rally in Pensacola, Florida
We zullen geen mensen in ons land binnenlaten die ons land gaan vernietigen. En dat mag dan wel of niet politiek correct zijn, maar eerlijk gezegd kan me dat niets schelen."
President Donald Trump
donderdag 7 december 2017
London Calling
[Editor’s note: You may not agree with everything in this Londoner’s personal account, but there his glimpse into how drastically London has changed and continues to change ought to give even the most hardened multiculturalist pause.]
The problem with London is that it has too much Islam. Vast areas of London are now cultural wastelands, thanks to Islam. London as a city is shrinking in terms of where one can go for fun things to do. Wherever Islam settles, fun things cease to exist. Pubs close down, nightclubs close, cinemas close. Walk through any Muslim-majority area in any part of the UK, and their high streets look like Third World bazaars. There are shops, but they are mainly market-stalls from which to do business. These clutter up the streets, and there are empty boxes lying everywhere. The produce on offer is of a very poor grade, and what the typical Muslim high-street has to offer is shops or stalls that sell rotting fruit and vegetables, hijabs or burqas. There are Islamic bookstores, and invariably there will be a mosque and a halal butcher shop — not much else. Oh, yes, there will also be some shops selling refurbished phones and SIM cards. These shops are filled with sun-bleached items that have lain in the windows for years. A lot of the shop-owners have been done for money-laundering, which would explain the rank odours upon entering and the worthless junk and outdated merchandise on display.
Read more>>>
The problem with London is that it has too much Islam. Vast areas of London are now cultural wastelands, thanks to Islam. London as a city is shrinking in terms of where one can go for fun things to do. Wherever Islam settles, fun things cease to exist. Pubs close down, nightclubs close, cinemas close. Walk through any Muslim-majority area in any part of the UK, and their high streets look like Third World bazaars. There are shops, but they are mainly market-stalls from which to do business. These clutter up the streets, and there are empty boxes lying everywhere. The produce on offer is of a very poor grade, and what the typical Muslim high-street has to offer is shops or stalls that sell rotting fruit and vegetables, hijabs or burqas. There are Islamic bookstores, and invariably there will be a mosque and a halal butcher shop — not much else. Oh, yes, there will also be some shops selling refurbished phones and SIM cards. These shops are filled with sun-bleached items that have lain in the windows for years. A lot of the shop-owners have been done for money-laundering, which would explain the rank odours upon entering and the worthless junk and outdated merchandise on display.
Read more>>>
woensdag 6 december 2017
Did the FBI retaliate against Michael Flynn by launching a Russia probe?
The FBI launched a criminal probe against former Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn two years after the retired Army general roiled the bureau’s leadership by intervening on behalf of a decorated counterterrorism agent who accused now-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe and other top officials of sexual discrimination, according to documents and interviews.
Flynn’s intervention on behalf of Supervisory Special Agent Robyn Gritz was highly unusual, and included a letter in 2014 on his official Pentagon stationary, a public interview in 2015 supporting Gritz’s case and an offer to testify on her behalf. His offer put him as a hostile witness in a case against McCabe, who was soaring through the bureau’s leadership ranks.
The FBI sought to block Flynn’s support for the agent, asking a federal administrative law judge in May 2014 to keep Flynn and others from becoming a witness in her Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) case, memos obtained by Circa show. Two years later, the FBI opened its inquiry of Flynn.
dinsdag 5 december 2017
How Islamisation has set Amsterdam 50 years back in time
A former inhabitant describes how Islamisation changed his Amsterdam neighbourhood. According to him socialist politicians are responsible for the dissapearance of Dutch culture and the rise of Islam in the area.
In 1990, I moved in to the “Bos en Lommer” area of West Amsterdam (in Dutch: “Amsterdam West”) to be with my lover at the time. Bos en Lommer is part of the second major expansion of Amsterdam from the city’s original canal centre outwards. It was built during the 1920s and 30s. Originally home to a mostly middle-class population, it has undergone a dramatic transformation in the last three decades, with the most rapid change happening since 2000.
Read more>>>
In 1990, I moved in to the “Bos en Lommer” area of West Amsterdam (in Dutch: “Amsterdam West”) to be with my lover at the time. Bos en Lommer is part of the second major expansion of Amsterdam from the city’s original canal centre outwards. It was built during the 1920s and 30s. Originally home to a mostly middle-class population, it has undergone a dramatic transformation in the last three decades, with the most rapid change happening since 2000.
Read more>>>
maandag 4 december 2017
NORWEGIAN ARMY CHIEF: Europe Needs To Destroy Islam If They Are Going To Survive
Norwegian Army Chief Odin Johannessen warns that European countries must be reading and willing to fight against radical Islam in order to preserve the values that unite the continent.“I think we must be ready to fight, both with words, actions – and if necessary weapons – to preserve the country and the values we have in common,” Johannessen said in a speech to the Oslo Military Society on Monday. Citing the Islamist attacks in Paris, Johannessen said that, “Europe can no longer expect to live in peace and security, without having to defend its interests and values.” The military chief went on to insist that well trained and adequately equipped soldiers would be crucial. “You can not win wars without having people on the ground,” he asserted. Johannessen’s remarks mirror similar sentiments expressed by other military officials in Europe.
Read more>>>
Read more>>>
donderdag 30 november 2017
Jewish refugees expelled from Arab lands and from Iran
This memorial day commemorates the tragedy of people who were forced to flee from their homes and to leave the countries where they had lived for millennia, solely because of their Jewish identity.
On 30 November, Israel and the Jewish world remember the fate of more than 850,000 Jews who were forced out of Arab countries and Iran in the 20th century.
This memorial day commemorates the tragedy of people who were forced to flee from their homes and to leave the countries where they had lived for millennia, solely because of their Jewish identity. Many were deprived of their belongings and many suffered from violence and persecution.
The story of the expulsion of entire Jewish communities from Arab lands is an important part of modern Jewish history that profoundly affected the Jewish nation as a whole as well as the demographic composition of the Middle East and North Africa. This is a story that has to be told.
Read more>>>
This memorial day commemorates the tragedy of people who were forced to flee from their homes and to leave the countries where they had lived for millennia, solely because of their Jewish identity. Many were deprived of their belongings and many suffered from violence and persecution.
The story of the expulsion of entire Jewish communities from Arab lands is an important part of modern Jewish history that profoundly affected the Jewish nation as a whole as well as the demographic composition of the Middle East and North Africa. This is a story that has to be told.
Read more>>>
dinsdag 28 november 2017
Inside Mueller’s PC purge of counter-terror training at the FBI
Special counsel Robert Mueller’s career is rife with examples of prioritizing politically correct sensitivities over the unfiltered, and sometimes difficult, truth of the matter. And this issue came to the forefront at the beginning of President Obama’s second term in office, when Mueller decided to purge hundreds of counter-terrorism training materials that arguably rendered America less safe in the face of a growing domestic Islamic extremist problem.
While serving as FBI director, Mueller (the current head of the special counsel investigation of the 2016 election) presided over an effort to silence counter-terrorism experts from discussing the threat posed by radical Islamic ideologies. His decision to choose this approach could call into question his judgement while presiding over an incredibly politically toxic debate surrounding the 2016 election.
Instead of providing the tools his agents needed to fight the ideological war against the continuing rise of radical Islam in America, Mueller handicapped his agents because he seemingly prioritized making sure that nobody was offended over keeping America safe.
Read more>>>
While serving as FBI director, Mueller (the current head of the special counsel investigation of the 2016 election) presided over an effort to silence counter-terrorism experts from discussing the threat posed by radical Islamic ideologies. His decision to choose this approach could call into question his judgement while presiding over an incredibly politically toxic debate surrounding the 2016 election.
Instead of providing the tools his agents needed to fight the ideological war against the continuing rise of radical Islam in America, Mueller handicapped his agents because he seemingly prioritized making sure that nobody was offended over keeping America safe.
Read more>>>
zondag 26 november 2017
Time to Drain the Swamp - Also in Europe
- Our democracies in the Western half of Europe have been subverted. Their goal is no longer to do what the people want. On the contrary, our political elites often do exactly the opposite. Our parliaments promote open-door policies that the majority of the people reject. Our governments sell out sovereignty to the EU against the will of the people. Our rulers welcome ever more Islam, although the majority of the people oppose it.
- Our democracies have become fake democracies. They are multi-party dictatorships, ruled by groups of establishment parties.... The establishment parties control everything, not just the politicians in their pay, but also the top brass of the civil service, the mainstream media, even the courts.... They call us "populists" because we stand for what the people want. They even drag us to court.
- We need to show that Europe's streets are our streets, that we want to stay who and what we are, and do not want to be colonized by Islam. Europe belongs to us!
This fact reminded me of a shameful event in my home town of The Hague, the seat of the Dutch Parliament and the government of the Netherlands. Look for a Ronald Reagan Street in The Hague and you will find none. A proposal in 2011 to name a street in The Hague after Reagan ran into fierce political opposition. Leftist parties, such as Labor, the Greens and the liberal D66 party, argued that naming a street in honor of Reagan would "do the image of the city no good." The whole affair ended in a disgraceful political compromise. Last year, a short stretch of a local bicycle path was named the "Reagan and Gorbachev Lane".
This anecdote is indicative of the difference between East and West in Europe. We can see the same difference in the attitude of their ruling elites towards Islam, the new totalitarianism that is threatening Europe today. In the East, political leaders oppose Islam; in the West, they surrender.
Read more>>
dinsdag 21 november 2017
BERLIJN - UPDATE - De
Duitse politie heeft met de arrestatie van zes Syriërs een mogelijke
aanslag op de bij Nederlanders populaire kerstmarkt van Essen voorkomen.
Volgens Duitse media gaat het om IS-leden.
Jaarlijks trekt de markt in Essen, die volgende week start, zo’n vijf miljoen bezoekers. Onder hen vele tienduizenden Nederlanders. Bild en de Hessenschau melden dat juist deze markt was uitgezocht voor een aanval. Andere media citeren een politiewoordvoerder die Essen niet wil bevestigen.
Verder lezen>>>
"Er is geen greintje bewijs voor de stelling dat IS-strijders op vluchtelingenbootjes naar Europa komen. Is hysterie
Volgens Duitse media gaat het om IS-leden.
Jaarlijks trekt de markt in Essen, die volgende week start, zo’n vijf miljoen bezoekers. Onder hen vele tienduizenden Nederlanders. Bild en de Hessenschau melden dat juist deze markt was uitgezocht voor een aanval. Andere media citeren een politiewoordvoerder die Essen niet wil bevestigen.
Verder lezen>>>
Dat is in ieder geval één aanslag die voorkomen is, maar ongetwijfeld zitten er meer in de planning. Reken maar dat onze moslimvrienden er alles aan zullen doen om dit een bloederige Kerst te laten worden nu hun kalifaat verpletterd is.
En laat vooral die laatste alinea van dat bericht eens goed tot u doordringen:
"De arrestanten hebben voor IS hebben gevochten in het Midden-Oosten. Ze zijn volgens Duitse media tussen december 2014 en september 2015 als vluchteling naar Duitsland gekomen."
Precies waar mensen als Geert Wilders dus al jaren voor waarschuwen is gebeurd. Geharde strijders en fanatieke mohammedanen zijn van het slagveld teruggekeerd in de vluchtelingenstroom. Iets wat Judith Sargentini op 18 mei 2015 op Twitter hooghartig als volgt afdeed:
"Er is geen greintje bewijs voor de stelling dat IS-strijders op vluchtelingenbootjes naar Europa komen. Is hysterie @EricPetri1"
http://tinyurl.com/ycxqq4zh
Het wordt hoog tijd dat we verdwaasde figuren als Judith Sargentini en al diegenen die weigeren onze grenzen te sluiten voor de massaal binnenstromende Mohammedanen verantwoordelijk houden voor de dode en verminkte slachtoffers van jihadaanslagen, ze uit hun machtsposities gooien en aanklagen voor landverraad en op zijn minst dood door schuld!
maandag 20 november 2017
Vrouwen hebben de plicht zich te verzetten tegen de hoofddoek
Door Blondemevrouw
“O Profeet, zeg tot jouw echtgenotes en tot jouw dochters en tot de vrouwen van de gelovigen dat zij hun gewaden over zich heen laten hangen. Op die manier is het gemakkelijk om hen te herkennen en worden zij niet lastig gevallen.” – Soera An-Noer (Het Licht) vers 31 + Surat Al-Ahzab 33:59
De islamitische hoofddoek is niet slechts een kledingstuk met een al dan niet fleurig motiefje. Het is een duidelijk islamitisch symbool met een belangrijke boodschap, die niet alleen gericht is van moslima aan moslim, maar zijn weerslag heeft op alle vrouwen. Dus ook op niet-islamitische vrouwen.
Voor wie duidelijk is waar de islamitische hoofddoek voor staat, is het onbegrijpelijk dat er zo weinig weerstand wordt geboden aan dit symbool. Met name vrouwen dienen zich massaal tegen de islamitische hoofddoek te verzetten. Maar dit verzet blijft tot nu toe uit. Onwetendheid? Desinteresse? Onderschatting? Opzet? Wat ligt eraan ten grondslag, dat vrouwen niet bereid blijken hun positie als vrouw met verworven vrijheden te beschermen?
Verder lezen>>>
“O Profeet, zeg tot jouw echtgenotes en tot jouw dochters en tot de vrouwen van de gelovigen dat zij hun gewaden over zich heen laten hangen. Op die manier is het gemakkelijk om hen te herkennen en worden zij niet lastig gevallen.” – Soera An-Noer (Het Licht) vers 31 + Surat Al-Ahzab 33:59
De islamitische hoofddoek is niet slechts een kledingstuk met een al dan niet fleurig motiefje. Het is een duidelijk islamitisch symbool met een belangrijke boodschap, die niet alleen gericht is van moslima aan moslim, maar zijn weerslag heeft op alle vrouwen. Dus ook op niet-islamitische vrouwen.
Voor wie duidelijk is waar de islamitische hoofddoek voor staat, is het onbegrijpelijk dat er zo weinig weerstand wordt geboden aan dit symbool. Met name vrouwen dienen zich massaal tegen de islamitische hoofddoek te verzetten. Maar dit verzet blijft tot nu toe uit. Onwetendheid? Desinteresse? Onderschatting? Opzet? Wat ligt eraan ten grondslag, dat vrouwen niet bereid blijken hun positie als vrouw met verworven vrijheden te beschermen?
Verder lezen>>>
Zomaar in “EenVandaag”: de massamoord op blanke boeren in Zuid-Afrika
 |
| Vier van de 3.600 door zwarten vermoorde blanken |
Een vriendin die in Zuid-Afrika woont met haar man, was een paar dagen in Nederland en afgelopen zaterdag 18 november 2017 een aantal uren bij mij op bezoek. Ze is in de 50 en altijd “links” geweest. Ach, wie niet? Nu zegt ze: die zwarten zijn over het algemeen totaal incompetent en corrupt en het duurt nog maximaal 10 jaar voordat de laatste blanke Zuid-Afrika heeft verlaten en het land in totale chaos wegzinkt. Het enige, zei ze, waarin ze echt goed zijn is tomeloos aanfokken: de meisjes beginnen op hun 13e al en zwarte vaders zijn zoals overal elders nergens. Verder zijn ze vol van het woord “entitlement” en dat betekent dat ze overal recht op hebben en slachtoffer zijn. En dat slachtofferschap wordt agressief uitgedragen. Ik antwoordde dat het wel moslims leken, want we waren lekker onder elkaar en in een generaliserende bui met een glaasje wijn erbij.
Ze zei ook nog dat je als witte geen Wekkeriaans “koloniaal archief” in de kop hoeft te hebben om in Zuid-Afrika enigszins bevooroordeeld te raken ten opzichte van het zwarte ras. Heb ik al opgemerkt dat die vriendin altijd “links” is geweest en ik eigenlijk ook? Enfin, ik vertelde haar nog dat haar verhaal me deed denken aan een ex-linkse kennis van me, ex-communist zelfs, die als correspondent van “De Waarheid” — (eertijds de krant van communistisch Nederland) — veel in Afrika had gezeten. Deze internationaal-revolutionair-van-huis-uit heeft me meermalen bezworen: “Wie één jaar in Afrika rondloopt en dan nog geen racist is geworden, is een idioot.”
Verder lezen>>>
zondag 19 november 2017
Muhammad’s Willing Executioners: How Mainstream Islam Threatens Jewish Existence
Originally posted at PJ Media, as “How Mainstream Islam Threatens Jewish Existence”
Whether one considers the masses of Muslims flowing into Europe as (primarily economic) refugees, proud hijra colonists “quietly” Islamizing the continent, or both, these newly arrived votaries of Islam express an unabashed Islamic Jew-hatred. Germany’s failed attempt to mollify this Muslim immigrant animus toward Jews by “sensitivity” visits to Nazi-era concentration camp memorials, demonstrates its deep-seated intractability.
The spectacle of brutality on display at Sachsenhausen did not awe [Syrian Muslim] Jamo, a former photographer who had known daily violence in Syria. No matter the direct perpetrator of the violence Jamo had witnessed, the greatest cause of conflict in the region, he said, was Israel…“The Arabs think what Hitler did was a good thing, because he freed them from the Jews.”
Read more>>>
zaterdag 18 november 2017
Het volk trekt een grens: Zwarte Piet blijft.
 |
| Wikipedia: Sinterklaas wordt in Groningen begeleid door Zwarte Pieten en Spaanse edelen, 2015 |
Uiteraard, de mensen in die bus zullen voor het overgrote deel nog nooit eerder in Friesland geweest zijn, laat staan helemaal in Dokkum. Die wittemensenprovincie interesseert ze ook niet, wat hebben ze daar te zoeken? Wat de Friezen doen, daar hebben deze randstedelijke beroepsklagers dan ook op geen enkele manier last van.
Een beetje gek dus, als er dan een feest wordt gevierd in Friesland, om naar deze provincie af te reizen om de mensen in deze provincie te vertellen dat ze Moreel Fout zijn en dat ze hun traditionele feesten anders moeten vieren voortaan. Waarna ze weer zullen vertrekken uit de provincie om nooit meer terug te komen en nooit op wat voor manier dan ook gehinderd te worden door welk feest dan ook in Friesland. Wat voor grond tot klagen heb je dan?
Verder lezen>>>
woensdag 15 november 2017
Farage: Soros en EU-Bondgenoten gezamenlijk in “Het grootste niveau van internationale politieke samenzwering in de geschiedenis”
Brexit-campagneleider Nigel Farage heeft miljardair opengrenzen-activist George Soros en zijn “betrouwbare vrienden” beschuldigd van grootschalige samenzwering.
Tijdens zijn speech in een debat over de Paradise Papers in het Europees Parlement, wees het UKIP-lid erop dat de miljardair de openbaring had gefinancierd.“Ik zeg dit op een moment dat het gebruik van geld en de invloed die het misschien heeft gehad op het Brexit-resultaat, of de verkiezing van Trump, een niveau van virtuele hysterie heeft bereikt,” zei hij.
“Nog maar verleden week is de verkiezingscommissie in het Verenigd Koninkrijk een onderzoek gestart om uit te zoeken of de Leave campagne overzees of Russisch geld heeft aangenomen.”
“Dit is gebeurd als gevolg van vragen die in het Lagerhuis zijn gesteld door ene Ben Bradshaw, iemand die verbonden is met een organisatie die Open Society wordt genoemd.”
“Ik vraag me af wanneer we het hebben over overzees-geld, als we het hebben over politieke subversie, als we het hebben over collusie, vraag ik me af of we op de verkeerde plek kijken.”
“En ik zeg dit omdat George Soros zijn organisatie Open Society onlangs, die natuurlijk campagne voert voor het vrije verkeer van mensen, en supranationale structuren zoals de Europese Unie ondersteunt, onlangs 18 miljard dollar heeft gegeven.”
“En zijn invloed hier, en in Brussel, is werkelijk buitengewoon.”
Verder lezen>>>
zondag 5 november 2017
Het Gelijk van Wilders: Roepende in de woestijn
Richting de ontknoping
Vergelijk
Het migratiesaldo zal naar alle verwachting dit jaar oplopen tot honderdduizend. Dit terwijl de natuurlijke aanwas van de bevolking laag blijft.met
PVV-leider Geert Wilders noemt de plannen van de nieuwe coalitie een ‘verschrikkelijk gedrocht van een regeerakkoord’. Volgens hem zijn terreur en islamisering de grootste bedreigingen van Nederland en Europa en ‘komt het woord islam niet één keer in het hele regeerakkoord voor.’De tsunami die ons overspoeld
Laten we de film maar eens terug spoelen. Het duurde tot de jaren ’80 -20 jaar na de start van de massa immigratie- voordat er überhaupt een heel klein beetje discussie over de multikul samenleving kwam. In de jaren ’90 roeptoeterde Kok nog dat Nederland een ‘multiculturele samenleving’ zou worden. Pas begin van deze eeuw kwam er een vorm van discussie op gang. Nu, 15 jaar later, is er geen ziel meer die nog gelooft dat de islam een positieve bijdrage heeft. De aanslagen, het moorden en de terreur van de islam is overal en onontkoombaar, zelfs voor de meest verstokte moslimknuffelaar.
Meer lezen>>>
zaterdag 4 november 2017
Transparent Lies
We don't use the word “lie” with abandon in these pages. It’s used far too often in public life, to the point at which nearly every statement someone disagrees with is characterized as a “lie.” The L-word is tightly regulated in parliamentary bodies—in Congress, for example—and rightly so. Once you call someone a liar, the good faith that allows for healthy debate is no longer possible.
On the subject of the Osama bin Laden documents, though, as Stephen F. Hayes and Thomas Joscelyn report in this issue, the administration of Barack Obama lied repeatedly and lied flagrantly. The documents were retrieved in the May 2011 raid on bin Laden’s compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. Obama rightly hailed the mission as a success, not only because U.S. forces killed the man responsible for the deaths of nearly 3,000 Americans on 9/11 without suffering a casualty, but also because they carried away an enormous trove of information about bin Laden’s global terrorist network. A senior intelligence official who briefed reporters at the Pentagon said: “As a result of the raid, we’ve acquired the single largest collection of senior terrorist materials ever.”
Read more>>>
On the subject of the Osama bin Laden documents, though, as Stephen F. Hayes and Thomas Joscelyn report in this issue, the administration of Barack Obama lied repeatedly and lied flagrantly. The documents were retrieved in the May 2011 raid on bin Laden’s compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan. Obama rightly hailed the mission as a success, not only because U.S. forces killed the man responsible for the deaths of nearly 3,000 Americans on 9/11 without suffering a casualty, but also because they carried away an enormous trove of information about bin Laden’s global terrorist network. A senior intelligence official who briefed reporters at the Pentagon said: “As a result of the raid, we’ve acquired the single largest collection of senior terrorist materials ever.”
Read more>>>
donderdag 2 november 2017
Russia Special Counsel Mueller Worked with Radical Islamist Groups to Purge Anti-Terrorism Training Material Offensive to Muslims
Now that Robert Mueller has been appointed special counsel to investigate if Russia influenced the 2016 presidential election it’s worth reiterating his misguided handiwork and collaboration with radical Islamist organizations as FBI director. Judicial Watch exclusively obtained droves of records back in 2013 documenting how, under Mueller’s leadership, the FBI purged all anti-terrorism training material deemed “offensive” to Muslims after secret meetings between Islamic organizations and the FBI chief. Judicial Watch had to sue to get the records and published an in-depth report on the scandal in 2013 and a lengthier, updated follow-up in 2015.
As FBI director, Mueller bent over backwards to please radical Islamist groups and caved into their demands. The agency eliminated the valuable anti-terrorism training material and curricula after Mueller met with various Islamist organizations, including those with documented ties too terrorism. Among them were two organizations— Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR)—named by the U.S. government as unindicted co-conspirators in the 2007 Holy Land Foundation terrorist financing case. CAIR is a terrorist front group with extensive links to foreign and domestic Islamists. It was founded in 1994 by three Middle Eastern extremists (Omar Ahmad, Nihad Awad and Rafeeq Jaber) who ran the American propaganda wing of Hamas, known then as the Islamic Association for Palestine.
The records obtained as part of Judicial Watch’s lawsuit show that Mueller, who served 12 years as FBI chief, met with the Islamist organizations on February 8, 2012 to hear their demands. Shortly later the director assured the Muslim groups that he had ordered the removal of presentations and curricula on Islam from FBI offices nationwide. The purge was part of a broader Islamist operation designed to influence the opinions and actions of persons, institutions, governments and the public at-large. The records obtained by Judicial Watch also show similar incidents of Islamic influence operations at the Departments of Justice and State, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Obama White House.
Read more>>>
As FBI director, Mueller bent over backwards to please radical Islamist groups and caved into their demands. The agency eliminated the valuable anti-terrorism training material and curricula after Mueller met with various Islamist organizations, including those with documented ties too terrorism. Among them were two organizations— Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR)—named by the U.S. government as unindicted co-conspirators in the 2007 Holy Land Foundation terrorist financing case. CAIR is a terrorist front group with extensive links to foreign and domestic Islamists. It was founded in 1994 by three Middle Eastern extremists (Omar Ahmad, Nihad Awad and Rafeeq Jaber) who ran the American propaganda wing of Hamas, known then as the Islamic Association for Palestine.
The records obtained as part of Judicial Watch’s lawsuit show that Mueller, who served 12 years as FBI chief, met with the Islamist organizations on February 8, 2012 to hear their demands. Shortly later the director assured the Muslim groups that he had ordered the removal of presentations and curricula on Islam from FBI offices nationwide. The purge was part of a broader Islamist operation designed to influence the opinions and actions of persons, institutions, governments and the public at-large. The records obtained by Judicial Watch also show similar incidents of Islamic influence operations at the Departments of Justice and State, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Obama White House.
Read more>>>
woensdag 1 november 2017
Tech Giants Are Biggest Threat Facing Trump Supporters
After tech giants testified before Congress on Tuesday, Americans should realize the richest and most powerful U.S. companies wield power and influence in a way not seen since the railroad tycoons and John D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil. Their ability to affect society and crush any potential competitors is unchallenged.
Facebook, Amazon, Google, and Apple have a combined market value of $2.6 trillion, which is larger than the entire economy of the United Kingdom. Executives and employees of those companies are also very large donors to the Democrat Party and left-wing causes. They all have vocal Democrats at the helm.
Today’s tech companies are even more powerful than their historical monopoly predecessors because of one key component: data. The information derived from our data is now king in everything from selling a product to shaping the news to—as we are now seeing—electing a president.
The Left is well aware of this power. After losing to President Trump, they are determined to shut down conservatives and not lose again.
Read more>>>
Facebook, Amazon, Google, and Apple have a combined market value of $2.6 trillion, which is larger than the entire economy of the United Kingdom. Executives and employees of those companies are also very large donors to the Democrat Party and left-wing causes. They all have vocal Democrats at the helm.
Today’s tech companies are even more powerful than their historical monopoly predecessors because of one key component: data. The information derived from our data is now king in everything from selling a product to shaping the news to—as we are now seeing—electing a president.
The Left is well aware of this power. After losing to President Trump, they are determined to shut down conservatives and not lose again.
Read more>>>
maandag 30 oktober 2017
‘Soros network’ in Brussels plots creating ‘Europe of mixed population’ – Hungarian PM
A network run by American-Hungarian financier George Soros has vast influence over EU bodies in Brussels and nurtures the creation of a “Europe of mixed population” by encouraging immigration, Hungary’s Prime Minister has argued.
Speaking to Radio Kossuth Friday, Viktor Orban launched yet another verbal attack on George Soros, calling him a ‘political puppet master’ having vast influence over EU’s top institutions.
Soros’ people have infiltrated the European Parliament and other bodies of the 28-member bloc, Orban claimed, seeking to create “a Europe of mixed population” and have Budapest “condemned and forced to change its migration policy.”
More than 200 members of European Parliament have been listed by Soros’ “empire” as “friends to the network,” Orban went on. “There are quite a few of them in the Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Committee [LIBE], including Hungarians,” he said.
Read more>>>
Soros’ people have infiltrated the European Parliament and other bodies of the 28-member bloc, Orban claimed, seeking to create “a Europe of mixed population” and have Budapest “condemned and forced to change its migration policy.”
More than 200 members of European Parliament have been listed by Soros’ “empire” as “friends to the network,” Orban went on. “There are quite a few of them in the Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Committee [LIBE], including Hungarians,” he said.
Read more>>>
Black lists matter: the betrayal of democratic liberalism
There’s a scene in Aaron Sorkin’s critically acclaimed political drama, The West Wing, where President Bartlet, (played by Martin Sheen) is in an argument with his communications director, Toby Ziegler, (played by Richard Schiff) over a speech he has to write condemning Hollywood for its gratuitous use of sex and violence in entertainment:
“…If I were an actor or a writer or uh, uh, uh, a producer in Hollywood and someone were to start coming at me with lists of things that were American and un-American I’d start to think that this was sounding eerily familiar.”
Bartlett replies: “Do I look like Joe McCarthy to you?”, to which Ziegler responds: “Nobody ever looks like Joe McCarthy, Mr President. How do you think they get in the door in the first place?”
Well, I’m afraid to say, Democracy 2.0 is having its own, new, modern-day McCarthy moment.
zondag 29 oktober 2017
Anti-Jew Text in Trilogy
Center for the Study of Political Islam
The Trilogy spends a lot of time on the Jews. In Mecca the mention is generally favorable. However, in Medina Jews were the enemy of Islam because they denied Mohammed as the final prophet. Here is the data on the Trilogy texts and the Jews. Notice that the Trilogy has more Jew hatred than Mein Kampf.
Read more>>>
The Trilogy spends a lot of time on the Jews. In Mecca the mention is generally favorable. However, in Medina Jews were the enemy of Islam because they denied Mohammed as the final prophet. Here is the data on the Trilogy texts and the Jews. Notice that the Trilogy has more Jew hatred than Mein Kampf.
| Source | Word Count | Percentage |
| Meccan Koran | 960 | 0.99% |
| Medinan Koran | 9282 | 16.9% |
| Total Koran | 10242 | 6.7% |
| Sira | 32,005 | 11.8% |
| Hadith | 57,563 | 8.9% |
| Total | 99,810 | |
| Trilogy Total | 1,069,064 | |
| Grand Ratio | 9.3% |
Read more>>>
zaterdag 28 oktober 2017
In Shocking, Viral Interview, Qatar Confesses Secrets Behind Syrian War
A television interview of a top Qatari official confessing the truth behind the origins of the war in Syria is going viral across Arabic social media during the same week a leaked top secret NSA document was published which confirms that the armed opposition in Syria was under the direct command of foreign governments from the early years of the conflict.
And according to a well-known Syria analyst and economic adviser with close contacts in the Syrian government, the explosive interview constitutes a high level "public admission to collusion and coordination between four countries to destabilize an independent state, [including] possible support for Nusra/al-Qaeda." Importantly, "this admission will help build case for what Damascus sees as an attack on its security & sovereignty. It will form basis for compensation claims."
A 2013 London press conference: Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jabr Al Thani with U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry. A 2014 Hillary Clinton email confirmed Qatar as a state-sponsor of ISIS during that same time period.
As the war in Syria continues slowly winding down, it seems new source material comes out on an almost a weekly basis in the form of testimonials of top officials involved in destabilizing Syria, and even occasional leaked emails and documents which further detail covert regime change operations against the Assad government. Though much of this content serves to confirm what has already long been known by those who have never accepted the simplistic propaganda which has dominated mainstream media, details continue to fall in place, providing future historians with a clearer picture of the true nature of the war.
This process of clarity has been aided - as predicted - by the continued infighting among Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) former allies Saudi Arabia and Qatar, with each side accusing the other of funding Islamic State and al-Qaeda terrorists (ironically, both true). Increasingly, the world watches as more dirty laundry is aired and the GCC implodes after years of nearly all the gulf monarchies funding jihadist movements in places like Syria, Iraq, and Libya.
Read more>>>
And according to a well-known Syria analyst and economic adviser with close contacts in the Syrian government, the explosive interview constitutes a high level "public admission to collusion and coordination between four countries to destabilize an independent state, [including] possible support for Nusra/al-Qaeda." Importantly, "this admission will help build case for what Damascus sees as an attack on its security & sovereignty. It will form basis for compensation claims."
A 2013 London press conference: Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jabr Al Thani with U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry. A 2014 Hillary Clinton email confirmed Qatar as a state-sponsor of ISIS during that same time period.
As the war in Syria continues slowly winding down, it seems new source material comes out on an almost a weekly basis in the form of testimonials of top officials involved in destabilizing Syria, and even occasional leaked emails and documents which further detail covert regime change operations against the Assad government. Though much of this content serves to confirm what has already long been known by those who have never accepted the simplistic propaganda which has dominated mainstream media, details continue to fall in place, providing future historians with a clearer picture of the true nature of the war.
This process of clarity has been aided - as predicted - by the continued infighting among Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) former allies Saudi Arabia and Qatar, with each side accusing the other of funding Islamic State and al-Qaeda terrorists (ironically, both true). Increasingly, the world watches as more dirty laundry is aired and the GCC implodes after years of nearly all the gulf monarchies funding jihadist movements in places like Syria, Iraq, and Libya.
Read more>>>
donderdag 26 oktober 2017
5 Reasons President Xi’s Speech Shows China Is a Threat to America
Last week China’s President Xi Jinping gave a 3 ½ hour speech at China’s Communist Party Congress. While some American commentators say China is becoming more like the west, Xi declared, on the contrary, that China is rising quickly to world superpower status, capable of challenging the US economically, politically, and, by 2050 militarily, too.
Democracy, freedom of speech, and the free market economy have no place in Xi’s vision of China.American political and business leaders need to wake up to China’s true intentions and capabilities.
In the near-term the Chinese strategy is to become the dominant superpower in Asia, but with their military, economic, and production might, they are well-placed to become the leading world superpower. One day the US will pay the price for its shortsightedness.
Read more>>>
woensdag 25 oktober 2017
Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier
Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee helped fund research that resulted in a now-famous dossier containing allegations about President Trump’s connections to Russia and possible coordination between his campaign and the Kremlin, people familiar with the matter said.
Marc E. Elias, a lawyer representing the Clinton campaign and the DNC, retained Fusion GPS, a Washington firm, to conduct the research.
After that, Fusion GPS hired dossier author Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer with ties to the FBI and the U.S. intelligence community, according to those people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
Elias and his law firm, Perkins Coie, retained the company in April 2016 on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the DNC. Before that agreement, Fusion GPS’s research into Trump was funded by an unknown Republican client during the GOP primary.
The Clinton campaign and the DNC, through the law firm, continued to fund Fusion GPS’s research through the end of October 2016, days before Election Day.
Read more>>>
Marc E. Elias, a lawyer representing the Clinton campaign and the DNC, retained Fusion GPS, a Washington firm, to conduct the research.
After that, Fusion GPS hired dossier author Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer with ties to the FBI and the U.S. intelligence community, according to those people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
Elias and his law firm, Perkins Coie, retained the company in April 2016 on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the DNC. Before that agreement, Fusion GPS’s research into Trump was funded by an unknown Republican client during the GOP primary.
The Clinton campaign and the DNC, through the law firm, continued to fund Fusion GPS’s research through the end of October 2016, days before Election Day.
Read more>>>
Thanks to Obama, America is two steps behind Iran in Middle East
The fall of Raqqa, capital of the Islamic State’s “caliphate” in Syria and Iraq, is unarguably an important politico-military milestone, albeit long overdue. Nonetheless, ISIS, a metastasized version of al Qaeda, remains a global terrorist threat, and prospects for Middle Eastern stability and security for America’s interests and allies are still remote.
Even as ISIS was losing Raqqa, Iraqi regular armed forces and Shiite militia were attacking Kirkuk and its environs, held by Iraqi Kurds since June 2014, when ISIS burst out of Syria and seized large swathes of territory from Baghdad’s collapsing army.
Read more>>>
Even as ISIS was losing Raqqa, Iraqi regular armed forces and Shiite militia were attacking Kirkuk and its environs, held by Iraqi Kurds since June 2014, when ISIS burst out of Syria and seized large swathes of territory from Baghdad’s collapsing army.
Read more>>>
zondag 15 oktober 2017
Interview with Fjordman
Interview with Fjordman
Note: This email interview was first published at the website The Apricity.
I was born in 1975. If I had any Islam-friendly or pro-Multicultural viewpoints in Norway in the 1990s, spending several years in the Middle East cured me of this. I was a student of Arabic at the American University in Cairo, Egypt, in 2001. I was in Cairo during the September 11th terror attacks in the USA that year. Some Egyptians I talked to were happy about these attacks against their American “allies.” Western mass media claimed that almost all Arabs and Muslims lamented the 9/11 attacks. I knew this was not true. I lived in the largest city in the Arabic-speaking world during these events.
In 2002 and 2003, I worked in Israel and the Palestinian territories in a civilian observer mission called Temporary International Presence in Hebron (TIPH). The mission itself is not very useful. However, I continued to learn more about Islamic culture and mentality. From my personal experiences and studies, Islam turned out to be a lot less peaceful than we are being told by the media and mainstream academia.
When I returned to Norway in August 2003, I was convinced that Europe was importing big and dangerous future conflicts because of Muslim immigration. I also took a Master’s degree at the University of Oslo with an emphasis on technology studies and Internet censorship.
I was active on various websites for several years. Eventually, in February 2005, I adopted the pseudonym Fjordman. I have been using that pen name ever since, also after my real identity became known in 2011.
Read more>>>
vrijdag 29 september 2017
Bolton: U.S. Should Support Independence for Kurds, ‘State of Iraq as We Have Known It Doesn’t Exist Anymore’
Former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton joined SiriusXM host Raheem Kassam and co-host Steve Bannon on Thursday’s Breitbart News Daily to talk about Kurdish independence and the future of Iraq.
“The Kurds are one of the largest ethnic groups in the world that has never had a nation in contemporary times,” Bolton explained. “Just two days ago, they held a referendum in Iraqi Kurdistan and voted well over 90 percent for independence. I think the United States should support independence for the Kurds. They’ve been friends of ours in the struggle against Saddam Hussein and the struggle against international terrorism. I think they’d be an important buffer against Iran.”
“And let’s face it: the state of Iraq as we have known it doesn’t exist anymore, and it’s not coming back together,” he added. “The Baghdad government is controlled by the ayatollahs from Tehran. The American strategy to defeat ISIS, which has relied so heavily on the Baghdad government, I think has been a mistake.”
Read more>>>
“The Kurds are one of the largest ethnic groups in the world that has never had a nation in contemporary times,” Bolton explained. “Just two days ago, they held a referendum in Iraqi Kurdistan and voted well over 90 percent for independence. I think the United States should support independence for the Kurds. They’ve been friends of ours in the struggle against Saddam Hussein and the struggle against international terrorism. I think they’d be an important buffer against Iran.”
“And let’s face it: the state of Iraq as we have known it doesn’t exist anymore, and it’s not coming back together,” he added. “The Baghdad government is controlled by the ayatollahs from Tehran. The American strategy to defeat ISIS, which has relied so heavily on the Baghdad government, I think has been a mistake.”
Read more>>>
dinsdag 12 september 2017
Reporting on the Rohingya: “The Tip of a Huge Iceberg of Misinformation”
by Hugh Fitzgerald
Aung San Suu Kyi, the leader of Myanmar, is now all over the news, being taken to task for “not speaking out” against the mistreatment of the Rohingya, the Muslim minority in Myanmar, almost all of whom live in the western Rakhine State of Myanmar. 365,000 people have signed a petition demanding she be stripped of her Nobel Prize for not speaking out and denouncing the Buddhists of Myanmar; in Pakistan, a country renowned for its humane treatment of minorities, her photograph has been publicly burned; Al Jazeera has denounced her, and so has that champion of justice Tariq Ramadan.
In the last month, the world media reports, 250,000 Rohingya have now fled the latest cycle of violence, that began with Rohingya attacks on the military in mid-August, for Bangladesh. In fact, Aung San Suu Kyi has spoken out, but not in the way that many expected. They wanted her to categorically denounce the Burmese military and to depict the Rohingya as entirely innocent victims of Buddhist attacks; this she has refused to do. She believes the story of the Rohingyas in Myanmar is more complicated than the outside world believes. She has noted that “fake news” about atrocities in Myanmar have been relied on by much of the world’s media. More than a few of the stories about the Rohingya have indeed been accompanied by photos purportedly showing the violence against them, but which, in fact, have turned out to be photos of other atrocities experienced by other peoples, having nothing to do with Myanmar. Even the BBC’s south-east Asia correspondent, Jonathan Head, concedes that “much of it [the photos, and the coverage] is wrong.” A closer look reveals that many of the pictures supposedly from Myanmar have come from other crises around the world, with one of those tweeted by Turkey’s Deputy Prime Minister Mehmet Simsek even dating back to the Rwandan genocide in 1994.
Read more>>>
Aung San Suu Kyi, the leader of Myanmar, is now all over the news, being taken to task for “not speaking out” against the mistreatment of the Rohingya, the Muslim minority in Myanmar, almost all of whom live in the western Rakhine State of Myanmar. 365,000 people have signed a petition demanding she be stripped of her Nobel Prize for not speaking out and denouncing the Buddhists of Myanmar; in Pakistan, a country renowned for its humane treatment of minorities, her photograph has been publicly burned; Al Jazeera has denounced her, and so has that champion of justice Tariq Ramadan.
In the last month, the world media reports, 250,000 Rohingya have now fled the latest cycle of violence, that began with Rohingya attacks on the military in mid-August, for Bangladesh. In fact, Aung San Suu Kyi has spoken out, but not in the way that many expected. They wanted her to categorically denounce the Burmese military and to depict the Rohingya as entirely innocent victims of Buddhist attacks; this she has refused to do. She believes the story of the Rohingyas in Myanmar is more complicated than the outside world believes. She has noted that “fake news” about atrocities in Myanmar have been relied on by much of the world’s media. More than a few of the stories about the Rohingya have indeed been accompanied by photos purportedly showing the violence against them, but which, in fact, have turned out to be photos of other atrocities experienced by other peoples, having nothing to do with Myanmar. Even the BBC’s south-east Asia correspondent, Jonathan Head, concedes that “much of it [the photos, and the coverage] is wrong.” A closer look reveals that many of the pictures supposedly from Myanmar have come from other crises around the world, with one of those tweeted by Turkey’s Deputy Prime Minister Mehmet Simsek even dating back to the Rwandan genocide in 1994.
Read more>>>
16 Years Later: Lessons Put into Practice?
Today marks the 16th anniversary of al-Qaida's 9/11 attacks. We learned much that tragic day, at enormous human and material cost. Perilously, however, America has already forgotten many of Sept. 11's lessons.
The radical Islamicist ideology manifested that day has neither receded nor "moderated" as many naive Westerners predicted. Neither has the ideology's hatred for America or its inclination to conduct terrorist attacks. Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution brought radical Islam to the contemporary world's attention, and it is no less malevolent today than when it seized our Tehran embassy, holding U.S. diplomats hostage for 444 days.
The Taliban, which provided al-Qaida sanctuary to prepare the 9/11 attacks, threaten to retake control in Afghanistan. Al-Qaida persists and may even be growing worldwide.
While ISIS's caliphate in Syria and Iraq will not survive much longer, countries across North Africa and the Middle East ("MENA") have destabilized or fractured entirely. Syria and Iraq have ceased to exist functionally, and Libya, Somalia and Yemen have descended into chaos. Pakistan, an unstable nuclear-weapons state, could fall to radicals under many easily predictable scenarios.
Read more>>>
The radical Islamicist ideology manifested that day has neither receded nor "moderated" as many naive Westerners predicted. Neither has the ideology's hatred for America or its inclination to conduct terrorist attacks. Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution brought radical Islam to the contemporary world's attention, and it is no less malevolent today than when it seized our Tehran embassy, holding U.S. diplomats hostage for 444 days.
The Taliban, which provided al-Qaida sanctuary to prepare the 9/11 attacks, threaten to retake control in Afghanistan. Al-Qaida persists and may even be growing worldwide.
While ISIS's caliphate in Syria and Iraq will not survive much longer, countries across North Africa and the Middle East ("MENA") have destabilized or fractured entirely. Syria and Iraq have ceased to exist functionally, and Libya, Somalia and Yemen have descended into chaos. Pakistan, an unstable nuclear-weapons state, could fall to radicals under many easily predictable scenarios.
Read more>>>
maandag 11 september 2017
EVERYTHING I NEEDED TO KNOW ABOUT ISLAM I LEARNED ON 9/11
How September 11 made me what I am.
September 11, 2017
Daniel Greenfield
"In the name of Allah, the Most Merciful, the Most Compassionate," a terrorist declares on the Flight 93 cockpit recording. That's followed by the sounds of the terrorists assaulting a passenger.
"Please don't hurt me," he pleads. "Oh God."
As the passengers rush the cabin, a Muslim terrorist proclaims, "In the name of Allah."
As New York firefighters struggle up the South Tower with 100 pounds of equipment on their backs trying to save lives until the very last moment, the Flight 93 passengers push toward the cockpit. The Islamic hijackers call out, "Allahu Akbar." The Islamic supremacist term originated with Mohammed's massacre of the Jews of Khaybar and means that Allah is greater than the gods of non-Muslims.
Mohammed Atta had advised his fellow terrorists that when the fighting begins, "Shout, 'Allahu Akbar,' because this strikes fear in the hearts of the non-believers." He quoted the Koran's command that Muslim holy warriors terrorize non-believers by beheading them and urged them to follow Mohammed's approach, "Take prisoners and kill them."
The 9/11 ringleader quoted the Koran again. "No prophet should have prisoners until he has soaked the land with blood."
On Flight 93, the fighting goes on. "Oh Allah. Oh the most Gracious," the Islamic terrorists cry out. "Trust in Allah," they reassure. And then there are only the chants of, "Allahu Akbar" as the plane goes down in a Pennsylvania field leaving behind another blood-soaked territory in the Islamic invasion of America.
Today that field is marked by the "Crescent of Embrace" memorial.
Thousands of Muslims cheered the attack in those parts of Israel under the control of the Islamic terrorists of the Palestinian Authority. They shouted, "Allahu Akbar" and handed out candy.
But similar ugly outbreaks of Islamic Supremacism were also taking place much closer to home.
On John F. Kennedy Boulevard, in Jersey City, across the river from Manhattan, crowds of Muslim settlers celebrated the slaughter of Americans. "Some men were dancing, some held kids on their shoulders," a retired Jersey City cop described the scene. "The women were shouting in Arabic."
Similar Islamic festivities broke out on Atlantic Avenue in Brooklyn, a major Islamic settlement area, even as in downtown Manhattan, ash had turned nearby streets into the semblance of a nuclear war. Men and women trudged over Brooklyn Bridge or uptown to get away from this strange new world.
Many just walked. They didn't know where they were going. I was one of them.
That Tuesday was a long and terrible education. In those hours, millions of Americans were being educated about many things: what happens when jet planes collide with skyscrapers, how brave men can reach the 78th floor with 100 pounds of equipment strapped to their backs and what are the odds are of finding anyone alive underneath the rubble of a falling tower. They were learning about a formerly obscure group named Al Qaeda and its boss. But they were also being educated about Islam.
Islamic terrorism was once something that happened "over there." You saw it on the covers of Time or Newsweek back when those were staples of checkout counters and medical offices. But even after the World Trade Center bombing, it wasn't truly "over here." But now it was. The war was here.
Each generation is born into history out of a moment of crisis. We are defined by our struggles. By the wars we fight and do not fight. On a Tuesday morning in September, my generation was born into history.
Some of us were born into it better than others.
At Union Square, I passed NYU students painting anti-war placards even as the downtown sky behind them was painted the color of bone. They ignored the crowd streaming up past them and focused intently on making all the red letters in NO WAR line up neatly on the white cardboard.
In the years since, I have seen that look on the faces of countless leftists who ignore the stabbers shouting, "Allahu Akbar" in London or the terrorist declaring, "In the name of Allah, the merciful," among the bloody ruin of a gay nightclub in Orlando. Instead they focus on their mindless slogans.
"NO WAR," "Stop Islamophobia" and "Refugees Welcome." The world of the cardboard sign and the simple slogan is an easier and neater one than a sky filled with the ashes of the dead.
On September 11, some of us opened our eyes. Others closed them as hard as they could.
That Tuesday irrevocably divided my generation. Some joined the military, the police or became analysts. Others turned left-wing activists, volunteered as lawyers for terrorists or converted to Islam.
The passengers on Flight 93 who took the lead were in their thirties. But the two firefighters who made it to the 78th floor of the South Tower, Ronald Bucca, who did duty in Vietnam as a Green Beret, and Orio Palmer, a marathon runner, were in their forties. Those men and women had the most meaningful answers to the old question, "Where were you when it happened?"
I was just one of countless people moving upstream away from Ground Zero.
The great lesson of that Tuesday morning was that it wasn't over. It wasn't over when we understood that we wouldn't find anyone alive in that twisted mass of metal and death. It wasn't over when the air began to clear. It wasn't over when the President of the United States spoke. It wasn't over when the planes began to fly again and the TV switched from non-stop coverage of the attacks and back to its regularly scheduled programming. It wasn't over when we were told to mourn and move on.
It still isn't over.
After every attack, Boston, Orlando, San Bernardino, New York, Paris, Manchester, London, Barcelona, we are encouraged to mourn and move on. Bury the bodies, shed a tear and forget about it.
Terrible things happen. And we have to learn to accept them.
But Tuesday morning was not a random catastrophe. It did not go away because we went back to shopping. It did not go away with Hope and Change. Appeasing and forgetting only made it stronger.
Everything I needed to know about Islam, I learned on September 11. The details of the theology came later. I couldn't quote the Koran while the sirens were wailing. But I learned the essential truth.
And so did you.
"Where were you?" is not just a question to be asked about September 11, 2001. It is an everyday question. What are you doing today to fight the Islamic terrorists who did this? And tomorrow?
I found my answer through my writing. Others have made a more direct contribution.
But it's important that we keep asking ourselves that question.
The 9/11 hijackers, the members of Al Qaeda, of ISIS, of the Muslim Brotherhood and the entire vast global terror network, its supporters and fellow travelers asked themselves that question every day.
They are still asking it.
From the Iranian nuclear program to the swarm of Muslim Brotherhood organizations in America, from the Muslim migrant surge into Germany to the sex grooming gangs of the UK, they have their answers.
Our enemies wake up every day wondering how to destroy us. Their methods, from demographic invasion to WMDs, from political subversion to random stabbings, are many.
A new and terrible era in history began on 9/11. We are no more past it than we were past Pearl Harbor at the Battle of Midway. Its origins are no mystery. They lie in the last sound that came from Flight 93.
"Allahu Akbar."
We are in the middle of the longest war in American history. And we still haven't learned how to fight it.
September 11 has come around again. You don't have to run into a burning building or wrestle terrorists with your bare hands. But use the day to warn others, so you can answer, "Where were you?"
September 11, 2017
Daniel Greenfield
"In the name of Allah, the Most Merciful, the Most Compassionate," a terrorist declares on the Flight 93 cockpit recording. That's followed by the sounds of the terrorists assaulting a passenger.
"Please don't hurt me," he pleads. "Oh God."
As the passengers rush the cabin, a Muslim terrorist proclaims, "In the name of Allah."
As New York firefighters struggle up the South Tower with 100 pounds of equipment on their backs trying to save lives until the very last moment, the Flight 93 passengers push toward the cockpit. The Islamic hijackers call out, "Allahu Akbar." The Islamic supremacist term originated with Mohammed's massacre of the Jews of Khaybar and means that Allah is greater than the gods of non-Muslims.
Mohammed Atta had advised his fellow terrorists that when the fighting begins, "Shout, 'Allahu Akbar,' because this strikes fear in the hearts of the non-believers." He quoted the Koran's command that Muslim holy warriors terrorize non-believers by beheading them and urged them to follow Mohammed's approach, "Take prisoners and kill them."
The 9/11 ringleader quoted the Koran again. "No prophet should have prisoners until he has soaked the land with blood."
On Flight 93, the fighting goes on. "Oh Allah. Oh the most Gracious," the Islamic terrorists cry out. "Trust in Allah," they reassure. And then there are only the chants of, "Allahu Akbar" as the plane goes down in a Pennsylvania field leaving behind another blood-soaked territory in the Islamic invasion of America.
Today that field is marked by the "Crescent of Embrace" memorial.
Thousands of Muslims cheered the attack in those parts of Israel under the control of the Islamic terrorists of the Palestinian Authority. They shouted, "Allahu Akbar" and handed out candy.
But similar ugly outbreaks of Islamic Supremacism were also taking place much closer to home.
On John F. Kennedy Boulevard, in Jersey City, across the river from Manhattan, crowds of Muslim settlers celebrated the slaughter of Americans. "Some men were dancing, some held kids on their shoulders," a retired Jersey City cop described the scene. "The women were shouting in Arabic."
Similar Islamic festivities broke out on Atlantic Avenue in Brooklyn, a major Islamic settlement area, even as in downtown Manhattan, ash had turned nearby streets into the semblance of a nuclear war. Men and women trudged over Brooklyn Bridge or uptown to get away from this strange new world.
Many just walked. They didn't know where they were going. I was one of them.
That Tuesday was a long and terrible education. In those hours, millions of Americans were being educated about many things: what happens when jet planes collide with skyscrapers, how brave men can reach the 78th floor with 100 pounds of equipment strapped to their backs and what are the odds are of finding anyone alive underneath the rubble of a falling tower. They were learning about a formerly obscure group named Al Qaeda and its boss. But they were also being educated about Islam.
Islamic terrorism was once something that happened "over there." You saw it on the covers of Time or Newsweek back when those were staples of checkout counters and medical offices. But even after the World Trade Center bombing, it wasn't truly "over here." But now it was. The war was here.
Each generation is born into history out of a moment of crisis. We are defined by our struggles. By the wars we fight and do not fight. On a Tuesday morning in September, my generation was born into history.
Some of us were born into it better than others.
At Union Square, I passed NYU students painting anti-war placards even as the downtown sky behind them was painted the color of bone. They ignored the crowd streaming up past them and focused intently on making all the red letters in NO WAR line up neatly on the white cardboard.
In the years since, I have seen that look on the faces of countless leftists who ignore the stabbers shouting, "Allahu Akbar" in London or the terrorist declaring, "In the name of Allah, the merciful," among the bloody ruin of a gay nightclub in Orlando. Instead they focus on their mindless slogans.
"NO WAR," "Stop Islamophobia" and "Refugees Welcome." The world of the cardboard sign and the simple slogan is an easier and neater one than a sky filled with the ashes of the dead.
On September 11, some of us opened our eyes. Others closed them as hard as they could.
That Tuesday irrevocably divided my generation. Some joined the military, the police or became analysts. Others turned left-wing activists, volunteered as lawyers for terrorists or converted to Islam.
The passengers on Flight 93 who took the lead were in their thirties. But the two firefighters who made it to the 78th floor of the South Tower, Ronald Bucca, who did duty in Vietnam as a Green Beret, and Orio Palmer, a marathon runner, were in their forties. Those men and women had the most meaningful answers to the old question, "Where were you when it happened?"
I was just one of countless people moving upstream away from Ground Zero.
The great lesson of that Tuesday morning was that it wasn't over. It wasn't over when we understood that we wouldn't find anyone alive in that twisted mass of metal and death. It wasn't over when the air began to clear. It wasn't over when the President of the United States spoke. It wasn't over when the planes began to fly again and the TV switched from non-stop coverage of the attacks and back to its regularly scheduled programming. It wasn't over when we were told to mourn and move on.
It still isn't over.
After every attack, Boston, Orlando, San Bernardino, New York, Paris, Manchester, London, Barcelona, we are encouraged to mourn and move on. Bury the bodies, shed a tear and forget about it.
Terrible things happen. And we have to learn to accept them.
But Tuesday morning was not a random catastrophe. It did not go away because we went back to shopping. It did not go away with Hope and Change. Appeasing and forgetting only made it stronger.
Everything I needed to know about Islam, I learned on September 11. The details of the theology came later. I couldn't quote the Koran while the sirens were wailing. But I learned the essential truth.
And so did you.
"Where were you?" is not just a question to be asked about September 11, 2001. It is an everyday question. What are you doing today to fight the Islamic terrorists who did this? And tomorrow?
I found my answer through my writing. Others have made a more direct contribution.
But it's important that we keep asking ourselves that question.
The 9/11 hijackers, the members of Al Qaeda, of ISIS, of the Muslim Brotherhood and the entire vast global terror network, its supporters and fellow travelers asked themselves that question every day.
They are still asking it.
From the Iranian nuclear program to the swarm of Muslim Brotherhood organizations in America, from the Muslim migrant surge into Germany to the sex grooming gangs of the UK, they have their answers.
Our enemies wake up every day wondering how to destroy us. Their methods, from demographic invasion to WMDs, from political subversion to random stabbings, are many.
A new and terrible era in history began on 9/11. We are no more past it than we were past Pearl Harbor at the Battle of Midway. Its origins are no mystery. They lie in the last sound that came from Flight 93.
"Allahu Akbar."
We are in the middle of the longest war in American history. And we still haven't learned how to fight it.
September 11 has come around again. You don't have to run into a burning building or wrestle terrorists with your bare hands. But use the day to warn others, so you can answer, "Where were you?"
Abonneren op:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
