Reporting on the Rohingya: “The Tip of a Huge Iceberg of Misinformation”

by Hugh Fitzgerald

Aung San Suu Kyi, the leader of Myanmar, is now all over the news, being taken to task for “not speaking out” against the mistreatment of the Rohingya, the Muslim minority in Myanmar, almost all of whom live in the western Rakhine State of Myanmar. 365,000 people have signed a petition demanding she be stripped of her Nobel Prize for not speaking out and denouncing the Buddhists of Myanmar; in Pakistan, a country renowned for its humane treatment of minorities, her photograph has been publicly burned; Al Jazeera has denounced her, and so has that champion of justice Tariq Ramadan.

In the last month, the world media reports, 250,000 Rohingya have now fled the latest cycle of violence, that began with Rohingya attacks on the military in mid-August, for Bangladesh. In fact, Aung San Suu Kyi has spoken out, but not in the way that many expected. They wanted her to categorically denounce the Burmese military and to depict the Rohingya as entirely innocent victims of Buddhist attacks; this she has refused to do. She believes the story of the Rohingyas in Myanmar is more complicated than the outside world believes. She has noted that “fake news” about atrocities in Myanmar have been relied on by much of the world’s media. More than a few of the stories about the Rohingya have indeed been accompanied by photos purportedly showing the violence against them, but which, in fact, have turned out to be photos of other atrocities experienced by other peoples, having nothing to do with Myanmar. Even the BBC’s south-east Asia correspondent, Jonathan Head, concedes that “much of it [the photos, and the coverage]  is wrong.” A closer look reveals that many of the pictures supposedly from Myanmar have come from other crises around the world, with one of those tweeted by Turkey’s Deputy Prime Minister Mehmet Simsek even dating back to the Rwandan genocide in 1994.

Read more>>>

16 Years Later: Lessons Put into Practice?

Today marks the 16th anniversary of al-Qaida's 9/11 attacks. We learned much that tragic day, at enormous human and material cost. Perilously, however, America has already forgotten many of Sept. 11's lessons.

The radical Islamicist ideology manifested that day has neither receded nor "moderated" as many naive Westerners predicted. Neither has the ideology's hatred for America or its inclination to conduct terrorist attacks. Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution brought radical Islam to the contemporary world's attention, and it is no less malevolent today than when it seized our Tehran embassy, holding U.S. diplomats hostage for 444 days.

The Taliban, which provided al-Qaida sanctuary to prepare the 9/11 attacks, threaten to retake control in Afghanistan. Al-Qaida persists and may even be growing worldwide.
While ISIS's caliphate in Syria and Iraq will not survive much longer, countries across North Africa and the Middle East ("MENA") have destabilized or fractured entirely. Syria and Iraq have ceased to exist functionally, and Libya, Somalia and Yemen have descended into chaos. Pakistan, an unstable nuclear-weapons state, could fall to radicals under many easily predictable scenarios.

Read more>>>

EVERYTHING I NEEDED TO KNOW ABOUT ISLAM I LEARNED ON 9/11

How September 11 made me what I am.

September 11, 2017

Daniel Greenfield

"In the name of Allah, the Most Merciful, the Most Compassionate," a terrorist declares on the Flight 93 cockpit recording. That's followed by the sounds of the terrorists assaulting a passenger.

"Please don't hurt me," he pleads. "Oh God."

As the passengers rush the cabin, a Muslim terrorist proclaims, "In the name of Allah."

As New York firefighters struggle up the South Tower with 100 pounds of equipment on their backs trying to save lives until the very last moment, the Flight 93 passengers push toward the cockpit. The Islamic hijackers call out, "Allahu Akbar." The Islamic supremacist term originated with Mohammed's massacre of the Jews of Khaybar and means that Allah is greater than the gods of non-Muslims.

Mohammed Atta had advised his fellow terrorists that when the fighting begins, "Shout, 'Allahu Akbar,' because this strikes fear in the hearts of the non-believers." He quoted the Koran's command that Muslim holy warriors terrorize non-believers by beheading them and urged them to follow Mohammed's approach, "Take prisoners and kill them."

The 9/11 ringleader quoted the Koran again. "No prophet should have prisoners until he has soaked the land with blood."

On Flight 93, the fighting goes on. "Oh Allah. Oh the most Gracious," the Islamic terrorists cry out. "Trust in Allah," they reassure. And then there are only the chants of, "Allahu Akbar" as the plane goes down in a Pennsylvania field leaving behind another blood-soaked territory in the Islamic invasion of America.

Today that field is marked by the "Crescent of Embrace" memorial.

Thousands of Muslims cheered the attack in those parts of Israel under the control of the Islamic terrorists of the Palestinian Authority. They shouted, "Allahu Akbar" and handed out candy.

But similar ugly outbreaks of Islamic Supremacism were also taking place much closer to home.

On John F. Kennedy Boulevard, in Jersey City, across the river from Manhattan, crowds of Muslim settlers celebrated the slaughter of Americans. "Some men were dancing, some held kids on their shoulders," a retired Jersey City cop described the scene. "The women were shouting in Arabic."

Similar Islamic festivities broke out on Atlantic Avenue in Brooklyn, a major Islamic settlement area, even as in downtown Manhattan, ash had turned nearby streets into the semblance of a nuclear war. Men and women trudged over Brooklyn Bridge or uptown to get away from this strange new world.

Many just walked. They didn't know where they were going. I was one of them.

That Tuesday was a long and terrible education. In those hours, millions of Americans were being educated about many things: what happens when jet planes collide with skyscrapers, how brave men can reach the 78th floor with 100 pounds of equipment strapped to their backs and what are the odds are of finding anyone alive underneath the rubble of a falling tower. They were learning about a formerly obscure group named Al Qaeda and its boss. But they were also being educated about Islam.

Islamic terrorism was once something that happened "over there." You saw it on the covers of Time or Newsweek back when those were staples of checkout counters and medical offices. But even after the World Trade Center bombing, it wasn't truly "over here." But now it was. The war was here.

Each generation is born into history out of a moment of crisis. We are defined by our struggles. By the wars we fight and do not fight. On a Tuesday morning in September, my generation was born into history.

Some of us were born into it better than others.

At Union Square, I passed NYU students painting anti-war placards even as the downtown sky behind them was painted the color of bone. They ignored the crowd streaming up past them and focused intently on making all the red letters in NO WAR line up neatly on the white cardboard.

In the years since, I have seen that look on the faces of countless leftists who ignore the stabbers shouting, "Allahu Akbar" in London or the terrorist declaring, "In the name of Allah, the merciful," among the bloody ruin of a gay nightclub in Orlando. Instead they focus on their mindless slogans.

"NO WAR," "Stop Islamophobia" and "Refugees Welcome." The world of the cardboard sign and the simple slogan is an easier and neater one than a sky filled with the ashes of the dead.

On September 11, some of us opened our eyes. Others closed them as hard as they could.

That Tuesday irrevocably divided my generation. Some joined the military, the police or became analysts. Others turned left-wing activists, volunteered as lawyers for terrorists or converted to Islam.

The passengers on Flight 93 who took the lead were in their thirties. But the two firefighters who made it to the 78th floor of the South Tower, Ronald Bucca, who did duty in Vietnam as a Green Beret, and Orio Palmer, a marathon runner, were in their forties. Those men and women had the most meaningful answers to the old question, "Where were you when it happened?"

I was just one of countless people moving upstream away from Ground Zero.

The great lesson of that Tuesday morning was that it wasn't over. It wasn't over when we understood that we wouldn't find anyone alive in that twisted mass of metal and death. It wasn't over when the air began to clear. It wasn't over when the President of the United States spoke. It wasn't over when the planes began to fly again and the TV switched from non-stop coverage of the attacks and back to its regularly scheduled programming. It wasn't over when we were told to mourn and move on.

It still isn't over.

After every attack, Boston, Orlando, San Bernardino, New York, Paris, Manchester, London, Barcelona, we are encouraged to mourn and move on. Bury the bodies, shed a tear and forget about it.

Terrible things happen. And we have to learn to accept them.

But Tuesday morning was not a random catastrophe. It did not go away because we went back to shopping. It did not go away with Hope and Change. Appeasing and forgetting only made it stronger.

Everything I needed to know about Islam, I learned on September 11. The details of the theology came later. I couldn't quote the Koran while the sirens were wailing. But I learned the essential truth.

And so did you.

"Where were you?" is not just a question to be asked about September 11, 2001. It is an everyday question. What are you doing today to fight the Islamic terrorists who did this? And tomorrow?

I found my answer through my writing. Others have made a more direct contribution.

But it's important that we keep asking ourselves that question.

The 9/11 hijackers, the members of Al Qaeda, of ISIS, of the Muslim Brotherhood and the entire vast global terror network, its supporters and fellow travelers asked themselves that question every day.

They are still asking it.

From the Iranian nuclear program to the swarm of Muslim Brotherhood organizations in America, from the Muslim migrant surge into Germany to the sex grooming gangs of the UK, they have their answers.

Our enemies wake up every day wondering how to destroy us. Their methods, from demographic invasion to WMDs, from political subversion to random stabbings, are many.

A new and terrible era in history began on 9/11. We are no more past it than we were past Pearl Harbor at the Battle of Midway. Its origins are no mystery. They lie in the last sound that came from Flight 93.

"Allahu Akbar."

We are in the middle of the longest war in American history. And we still haven't learned how to fight it.

September 11 has come around again. You don't have to run into a burning building or wrestle terrorists with your bare hands. But use the day to warn others, so you can answer, "Where were you?" 

Speech Geert Wilders Ambrosetti conferentie, Italië, Villa d’Este, 2 september 2017

Dames en heren,

Bedankt dat ik hier vandaag mag zijn. Ik waardeer het dat u iemand uitnodigt die uw enthousiasme voor de Europese Unie niet deelt. Of uw Europese droom zoals Euro Commissaris Frans Timmermans het zojuist noemde. Om eerlijk te zijn: zijn droom is mijn nachtmerrie.

Ik besef dat mijn mening verschilt van die van de vele leden van de Europese elite in ons midden, maar ik ben een optimist.

Ik geloof in een positieve toekomst voor Europa als een gemeenschap van onafhankelijke, soevereine en democratische landen - samenwerkend zonder een supranationale politieke unie - een Europa zonder de Europese Unie.

Ik geloof dat een echte democratie alleen kan bestaan en bloeien binnen een natiestaat. De nationale soevereiniteit gecombineerd met de binnenlandse cultuur geeft ons onze identiteit. Evenals controle over onze eigen grenzen en begroting en het recht om te beslissen hoe we het zelf als natie gebruiken.
Helaas hebben de meeste van onze regeringen steeds meer bevoegdheden overgedragen aan de EU, waardoor veel belangrijke dingen die we in de afgelopen eeuwen hebben bereikt, ondermijnd worden.

Lees verder>>>

Delingpole: Ship of Fools IV: Another Green Arctic Expedition Scuppered by Ice

A sailing expedition to the North Pole to raise awareness of global warming has been forced to turn back, 590 nautical miles short of its destination, after the yachts found their passage blocked by large quantities of an unexpected frozen white substance.

According to Arctic Mission’s website:

A meeting of the four skippers was held led by Erik de Jong, with Pen Hadow present, and it was agreed further northward progress would increase considerably the risks to the expedition, with very limited scientific reward. The decision to head south, back to an area of less concentrated sea ice in the vicinity of 79 degrees 30 minutes North, was made at 18.30 (Alaskan time).

Concentrated sea ice? In the Arctic Circle? Whoever would have imagined?

Read more>>>

Uitzinnige hoeveelheid bewijs voor het nazistische Jodenhaat-karakter van de islam en de Palmaffia’s

Posted by martienpennings in Uncategorized

In deze nazomer van 2017 heb ik met collega-vertaler Jolanda van der Vorst-Molleman Dijksterhuis de laatste hand gelegd aan de vertaling van bovenstaand boek dat in onze links-regressieve wereld alleen kan worden uitgegeven bij een verstandige en idealistische eenmans-uitgeverij als “De Blauwe Tijger”. (Zie hier de aankondiging) Het boek zal oktober 2017 in de verkoop komen.
Op dit moment schrijf ik aan een degelijke recensie, maar omdat het belang van het boek zo groot is en ik dus zo veel mogelijk publiciteit wil genereren,  hieronder een ultra-korte vóór-recensie (soort van).

Lees verder>>>

Anglojew's Interview With The Great Counter-Jihadist Norwegian Blogger Fjordman

The early 21st century is not the first time warnings of calamity have been ignored. Roman historian Livy tells us that in 391 BC a Roman plebian named Marcus Caedicius heard a warning from the goddess Vesta's sacred grove -of an imminent Gaulish attack- recommending the walls of Rome be fortified & instructing him to pass these messages on to the magistrates; but because of Caedicius's humble station this portent was not heeded & the Gauls sacked Rome in 390 BC.

Like Marcus Caedicius Fjordman has been warning of the dangers posed by barbarians, in this case those who submit to Mohammed's Dark-Age teachings (known as Muslims [Submitters]), to our Western society & culture since the beginning of the century. Alas, his message has also largely fallen on deaf ears. Rome will fall once more if we do not heed his warnings.

This is possibly the most important topic there is & one that needs as much publicity as possible especially in light of the globalist forces attempting to manipulate the Islamic hordes for their own ends.

Here I present my lengthy interview with the great Norwegian blogger, political comentator, Islam-critic & Patriot of Western Culture Peder Jensen, known by his nom de plume Fjordman

For those of you who haven't heard of Fjordman he is one of the most influential figures in the so-called "Counter-Jihad" movement with its warnings of an Islamic takeover of the West.

Excerpts from this interview may also appear in future at the famous Gates Of Vienna website but here I present it in its entirety.

I think that his responses read better as an essay -as the themes tend to blend into one another & cross-polllinate- rather than as point-by-point answers to my questions, however, I will include my questions above them in bold.

Aprecians here is my interview with the great man himself:

Hello Fjordman,

Thanks so much for your time. This interview will be for a thread on "The Apricity" European cultural community free speech forum. Our readers tend to have a deep interest in European heritage & tend to be right of centre.

It's quite a long interview so please feel free to answer which ever questions you like. I appreciate your time. I don't believe in censorship so won't edit your answers.

Questions;

Read more>>>

Obama's 3rd term: 7 ways Trump admin has foreign policy backward

The Trump administration is operating within the confines of the perverse alliances and investments Obama made in the Middle East, contradicting everything the president said during the campaign.
The adage of “personnel is policy” is one of the few political bromides that actually holds true. And because Trump does not have a single constitutional conservative advising him or overseeing national security and foreign policy issues, it’s not surprising that many of Obama’s appallingly backward priorities are continuing.

The end goal of foreign policy is protecting our nation first and then protecting strategic assets and interests abroad second. If we actually understood those strategic interests, the nature of Islam, and what can and cannot be redressed in the Middle East, we could improve our security outlook. Using soft power against adversaries, making the right alliances and foreign aid choices, and preserving our resolve and resources for military action when there is actually a threat that must and be redressed with hard force would go much farther than sending our troops into endless Islamic civil wars. Sadly, the latter approach is continuing under this administration.

Here are seven recent developments that demonstrate the wrongheadedness of Trump’s foreign policy and how it is a continuation of Obama’s presidency:

Read more>>>

How Can US Leaders NOT Know About Islam?

When Understanding the Threat (UTT) conducts its 3-day “Understanding and Investigating the Jihadi Network” two things are always true at the end of the course:  (1) the attendees tell us none of them – including FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force agents/officers – were aware of the information presented prior to attending the course, and (2) they all believe the information is critical to protecting their communities.

How is this possible?

In the last few weeks, UTT has written articles, given numerous media interviews, produced UTT’s Radio Show, and related information via social media detailing the failure of our government to identify the Islamic threat and deal with it in a factual/reality-based manner.

This produced numerous questions from UTT followers, media, and others asking “How is it possible U.S. leaders are so ignorant of Islam and sharia?”

The answer is simple: 100% of our enemy states they are muslims waging jihad to establish an Islamic State under sharia.  They call the means to do this “Civilization Jihad,” and the U.S. Islamic Movement – primarily led by the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood – does this by controlling the narrative about Islam inside our system.  The MB controls the narrative by controlling the information our national security professionals receive as it relates to “terrorism” and related matters.

Inside the government, there is no training which provides employees of the State Department, FBI, CIA, DHS, DIA, National Security staffs, Pentagon, military commands, or other key components of the government factual information about sharia (Islamic Law) and its role in this war.  Nor is there substantive training related to the massive jihadi network in the United States, primarily led by the Muslim Brotherhood.

How did we get here?

Read more>>>

Mohammedaanse kleuters

“Zelfs Radicalisering bij kleuters” kopt ‘het laatste nieuws’ vandaag in volle komkommertijd op haar voorpagina. “Ze noemen klasgenootjes varkens en bedreigen hen met vinger over de keel”, getuigt een kleuterjuf.

Niettegenstaande deze krant elders de woordjes islam, moslim of mohammedaan nog altijd nauwelijks uit de pen geperst krijgt brengt Het Laatste Nieuws toch verslag uit over de realiteit die al jaren lang onderdrukt en gecensureerd wordt door het intellectueel terrorisme van het politiek correcte journaille en de ons leidende politiek correcte kaste.

Natuurlijk is de bewering over “radicalisering” bij de allerkleinsten een schandalige leugen. Radicaliseren betekent immer meer radicale standpunten gaan aankleven dan voordien. Kleuters hadden voordien geen eigen mening dus kunnen ze ook niet radicaliseren hoogstens nabootsen wat ze hebben gehoord en gezien.

Lees verder>>>

Suikerspiegelchauffeur Centraal Station heet niet Farid. Hij heet Khalid Karmaoui

Gekregen van een kuchende man in een regenjas: de volledige naam van de suikerspiegelchauffeur op Centraal Station is Khalid Karmaoui.

Toch goed dat we de vraag vanmorgen, op basis van een twitteraar, nog eens opwierpen. Want er is prompt een mol opgedoken die ons bovenstaande foto heeft geleverd. Niet Farid. Maar Khalid is de naam van de chauffeur die acht mensen verwondde door vol gas het plein voor het Centraal Station op te scheuren. “Onwelwording”, zeiden de autoriteiten, die verder geen beelden, geen naam en zelfs geen initialen vrijgaven en de ’45-jarige Amsterdamse chauffeur’ na vier dagen zonder aanklacht lieten gaan – velen met vragen en in verwarring achterlatend.

Lees verder>>>

Report: Bannon Urged Trump to Move U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem — Was Blocked by Jared Kushner

TEL AVIV – According to a report in Vanity Fair, while he served as White House chief strategist, Steve Bannon heavily lobbied President Trump to move the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Israel’s capital, Jerusalem, but the move was blocked by Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser.

Citing three Bannon allies, the magazine further reported that Bannon boycotted a meeting with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, quipping, “I’m not going to breathe the same air as that terrorist.”

Read more>>>

TOOLS OF JIHAD Shocking police pictures reveal 10,000-weapon arsenal including howitzers, machine guns and grenades intended for the hands of terrorists in Europe

Police found the stash in Spain back in January but have only now released the terrifying images

POLICE last night revealed an arsenal of more than 10,000 weapons destined for the hands of terrorists and organised gangs around Europe.

A continent-wide operation stopped weapons including anti-aircraft guns, howitzers and grenades falling into the hands of extremists in France, Spain and Belgium.

Some were previously described as being powerful enough to “bring down an aircraft”.

Read more>>>

Remember the pictures of murdered Christians and Yazidi's in Syria? Kicked out of their homes, robbed of their possessions by ISIL and their former "friends" and neighbors? Unless we close our borders, shut down (radical) mosques and start remigrating (radical) Muslims, we will one day see the same pictures starring ourselves and our children. In our own countries. Because that is what Islam does. Everywhere it turns up.

'European Union is just another name for 4th Reich!' Poles FURIOUS at German-led EU

THE ultimate goal of the European Union is to dissolve borders under a communist German super-state, a trio of Polish experts has claimed.

 A panel of experts discussing the current political climate in Poland, told a political discussion show that instability in the nation was caused by the EU's goal to deprive Europe of its independence.

Krzysztof Karoń, Polish publicist, spoke on Telewizja Republika where he accused the European Union of writing its "communist agenda" into its own laws.

He said: "In March this year the European Commission signed its white paper, which was dubbed the Rome Declaration.

"The only binding manifesto of the EU became the communist manifesto from 1941.

Read more>>>

Prisoners Tortured to Death By Erdogan

An important list on the horros inflicted on Turkish citizens by Erdogan's AKP regime. An ally of the west, E.U Candidate and NATO member. Thread by @MahirZeynalov

The Google Gulag

Let me Google that for you.

James Damore is an FIDE chess master who studied at Princeton, MIT and Harvard. He had been working as a software engineer at Google for four years.

Danielle Brown is the new Vice President of Diversity at Google. She has an MBA from the University of Michigan and campaigned for Hillary.

She had been working at Google for a few weeks.

James Damore wrote a memo suggesting that Google should pursue ideological diversity, end discriminatory efforts to achieve identity politics diversity and be honest about gender differences. Danielle responded by denouncing his paper. “It’s not a viewpoint that I or this company endorses, promotes or encourages.”

Read more>>>

Exclusive: Here's The Full 10-Page Anti-Diversity Screed Circulating Internally at Google [Updated]

Update 8/5/17 7:25pm ET: Google’s new Vice President of Diversity, Integrity & Governance Danielle Brown has issued her own memo to Google employees in response to the now-viral memo, “Google’s Ideological Echo Chamber.” Brown’s statement, obtained by Motherboard, can be found in full at the end of this article. 

A software engineer’s 10-page screed against Google’s diversity initiatives is going viral inside the company, being shared on an internal meme network and Google+. The document’s existence was first reported by Motherboard, and Gizmodo has obtained it in full.

In the memo, which is the personal opinion of a male Google employee and is titled “Google’s Ideological Echo Chamber,” the author argues that women are underrepresented in tech not because they face bias and discrimination in the workplace, but because of inherent psychological differences between men and women. “We need to stop assuming that gender gaps imply sexism,” he writes, going on to argue that Google’s educational programs for young women may be misguided.

Read more>>>

PDF with working links here

Update: Why I Was Fired by Google 

Here’s the Memo That Blew Up the NSC

Fired White House staffer argued "deep state" attacked Trump administration because the president represents a threat to cultural Marxist memes, globalists, and bankers.

The memo at the heart of the latest blowup at the National Security Council paints a dark picture of media, academics, the “deep state,” and other enemies allegedly working to subvert U.S. President Donald Trump, according to a copy of the document obtained by Foreign Policy.

The seven-page document, which eventually landed on the president’s desk, precipitated a crisis that led to the departure of several high-level NSC officials tied to former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. The author of the memo, Rich Higgins, who was in the strategic planning office at the NSC, was among those recently pushed out.

The full memo, dated May 2017, is titled “POTUS & Political Warfare.” It provides a sweeping, if at times conspiratorial, view of what it describes as a multi-pronged attack on the Trump White House.

Trump is being attacked, the memo says, because he represents “an existential threat to cultural Marxist memes that dominate the prevailing cultural narrative.” Those threatened by Trump include “‘deep state’ actors, globalists, bankers, Islamists, and establishment Republicans.”

The memo is part of a broader political struggle inside the White House between current National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster and alt-right operatives with a nationalist worldview who believe the Army general and his crew are subverting the president’s agenda.

Read more>>>

McMaster Worked at Think Tank Backed by Soros-Funded Group that Helped Obama Sell Iran Nuclear Deal

TEL AVIV — White House National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster served at a UK-based think tank financed by a controversial, George Soros-funded group identified by the Obama White House as central in helping to sell the Iran nuclear deal to the public and news media.

 From September 2006 to February 2017, McMaster is listed as a member of International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), where he served as consulting senior fellow. The IISS describes itself as a “world-leading authority on global security, political risk and military conflict.”

The IISS has been supportive of the Obama administration-brokered 2015 nuclear accord with Iran, and the group has repeatedly hit back against charges that Tehran has violated the agreement.

Read more>>>

Censored! McMaster Barred Scholar Ayaan Hirsi Ali from Giving Talk on Radical Islam at NSC

Ayaan Hirsi Ali was schedule to present a paper on radical Islamic terror at the National Security Counsel before being blocked by H.R. McMaster and his recently appointed Senior Director of Counter-Terrorism, Mustafa Javed Ali.

 Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who was in town to present her work to the Senate, was also prohibited from visiting the President during her White House visit, where she was allowed to meet with select members of the NSC in an informal setting.

Asked why she was censored, a source reported, “Mustafa Javed Ali said she was Islamophobic, and that the only way she could present her paper would be to have someone from CAIR come in to refute her work.”

Read more>>>